Kim Kardashian’s full-skirted trench coat: unfortunate or cute?

I’m hesitant to even admit this, but here goes: I’m built a lot like Kim Kardashian. Only my junk is natural, and Kim’s… well, I’ve never known for sure about the alleged butt implants, but I think the boobs are fake. Anyway, for girls built like me and Kim, there are certain style rules that you just know, in your heart, from an early age. Like, as soon as you start “filling out”. I’ve read interviews with Kim where she’s described her too-early development, and I’ve related to that. I was a C-cup by the age of 14 (and I’m now a double-D). Kim and I have similar “problem areas” too – I can just tell. Our thighs will always be the bane of our existence, and it’s always a struggle to show off our smaller waists given that everything else is so epically proportioned.

So… the idea of her coat is understandable. I know exactly what went through Kim’s head when she selected this coat and when she cinched it at the waist. She was thinking, “Look, I have a small waist, I’m not just a huge pair of tits and a giant ass!” Unfortunately for Kim, she tends to forget the style rules that curvy girls always need to follow – you should never have this much volume going on below the waist. The top of the coat is fine – she looks cute from the waist up. It’s the full-skirted coat bottom that is disturbing me. Instead of looking cute and lithe, the whole thing looks like a costume created for a Tim Burton film, right?

Oh, and that’s her “boyfriend” Kris Humphries with her. He’s a giant. Imagine how friggin’ tall he is if he’s still towering over her while she’s wearing those gigantic boots!

Photos courtesy of Fame.